技术报告写作
一、报告基础结构 | Report Structure
二、工程报告类型 | Types of Engineering Reports
三、常用报告句式 | Common Report Phrases
四、数据与图表 | Data, Charts & Figures
五、报告编写技巧 | Report Writing Skills
Characters: Project Director (项目总监 PD) / Planning Engineer (计划工程师 PE) · Characters: HSE Manager (HSE经理 HM) / Operations Director (运营总监 OD)
The monthly report for May needs to go to the client by this Friday, 6 June. I reviewed your draft — the data is solid, but the executive summary needs more punch. What are the three things the client really cares about this month?
5月月报周五6月6日前要发给业主。看了你的草稿——数据扎实，但执行摘要需要更 有力。这个月业主真正关心哪三件事？
I'd say: one, the turbine foundation delay and our recovery plan; two, local content compliance — we're at 72% against a 75% target; and three, the upcoming rainy season impact on earthworks.
我觉得：一、汽机基础延误和赶工计划；二、本地化率合规——72%比目标75%； 三、即将到来的雨季对土方工程的影响。
Good picks. Rewrite the executive summary in that order — one page max. Start each section with a bold headline, then two to three bullet points with the key numbers. The detailed data can stay in the body. Also, add a comparison table showing planned vs. actual for the top 10 milestones.
选得好。按这个顺序重写执行摘要——不超过一页。每节粗体标题开头，两到三个 要点附关键数字。详细数据留在正文。再加一张十大里程碑计划vs实际对比表。
Will do. One question — the local content shortfall: should we propose mitigation in the report, or wait for the client to ask?
好的。有个问题——本地化率不足：报告里主动提缓解措施，还是等业主问？
Always be proactive. Include the gap analysis and our action plan: the three new local supplier contracts we're finalizing. Show them we're ahead of the problem. That builds trust. Submit the final draft to me by Wednesday noon — I need time to review before signature.
永远主动。把差距分析和我们的行动计划放进去：正在签的三个新本地供应商合同。 让他们看到我们走在问题前面。这建立信任。周三中午前给我终稿——签字前我要时间审。
I've completed the incident investigation report for the scaffolding collapse on 28 May. The report is 18 pages covering timeline, RCA, corrective actions, and supporting photos. Here's your copy.
5月28日脚手架坍塌事故调查报告完成了。18页涵盖时间线、根因分析、纠正措施 和照片证据。这是您的副本。
Let me scan the RCA section first. You used the Five Whys method?
先看根因部分。用了五问法？
Yes. Root cause identified as lack of competent person inspection after modification. The scaffold was altered by a maintenance crew to access a pipe flange, and no re-inspection was done. The contributing factors were inadequate scaffold tagging procedures and no formal management of change process for scaffold modifications.
是。根因确定为修改后缺乏资质人员检查。脚手架被维修组为靠近管法兰而改动， 之后未重新检查。促成因素是脚手架挂牌程序不完善、缺少正式的脚手架变更管理流程。
The logic holds up. But the recommendations — you've listed seven. For a board-level report, that's too many. Consolidate into three: one for the immediate physical fix, one for the procedural gap, and one systemic. And add a one-page executive summary for the senior management who won't read 18 pages.
逻辑站得住。但建议项——你列了七条。对于董事会级别报告太多了。合并成三条： 一条立即物理整改、一条流程缺陷、一条体系层面。再加一页执行摘要给不读18页的 高层。
Agreed. I'll restructure. The three headline recommendations: 1. Immediate reinspection of all modified scaffolds on site. 2. Mandatory tagging and MOC procedure for scaffold alterations. 3. Company-wide scaffold safety stand-down and refresher training. I'll have the revised report on your desk tomorrow morning.
同意。我重构一下。三条核心建议：1. 立即重新检查现场所有改动过的脚手架。 2. 脚手架变更强制挂牌+MOC流程。3. 全公司脚手架安全停工复训。明早修订报告 放您桌上。